Here's a write up I did for Small Craft Advisor, the magazine:
We sold the Nimble 20 after 5 seasons. Not because we were unhappy
with her, just wanted to try a boat with a different hull shape.
Flat bottom/center board/beamy versus narrow/low freeboard/modified
full keel.
The Nimble, while bigger than most boats profiled in SCA, is closer
to the core ideology of the magazine and it's readers: Easy to trailer,
simple to rig and launch, float in a foot of water, beachable. The
unique looks, with the bulky hull and tanbark yawl rig makes it
easily recognized and as such has garnered a wide appeal.
The Sea Sprite (SS) is a small version of the classic yacht so
ubiquitous maybe 70 years ago, with her full keel, short waterline
and long overhangs. It's a type of boat that's not super practical
for the trailer crowd, not appealing to mainstream cruising sailors
because of the cramped cabin, not flashy enough to be a status symbol.
But what do you get in a Sea Sprite? In the right hands she's wicked
fast and exciting to sail, but with a 'big boat' sense of stability
and heft.
Think about it: A 30' mast with lots of sail area on a 16' waterline
and displacing 4000 lbs. All from the drawing board of Carl Alberg,
who knew a thing or two about sailboats.
In Turnstone (the Nimble), we were always the slowest boat out
there in any conditions. Set us up with a short, steep chop and
a destination to weather and we would never make it. The hull with
its flat bottomed entry would pound and stop. Pare that with a low,
smallish rig and there just wasn't any power available. The SS,
on the other hand, loves slicing thru waves, points acceptably high
and just goes. Pure joy to sail close hauled.
A Nimble is sailed upright on all points, a SS must heel considerably
to lengthen waterline and gain speed. This is a huge difference
for us, a relatively land-lubberish family. The first time on the
SS when our lee rail went under and sent foamy water gushing around
the winch we screamed of fear. Then we felt the acceleration and
screamed of joy!! Later we had to go below and clean up the mess,
as on Turnstone we were used to simply leaving last nights left-overs
on the counter no matter the conditions.
Where Turnstone excelled was with the with wind aft of the beam.
So far we don't have a lot of experience with the SS, but it seems
like Turnstone sailed better and handled easier on a quarter reach.
Maybe it just the low freeboard and hence the exposure to big following
seas in the SS that affects my judgment at this point.
The stock rudder on a Nimble is weak, both in construction and
steering. Motoring in a marina or other tight quarters is difficult.
Add a little breeze and it quickly becomes an embarrassing affair.
We thought it was mostly us being incompetent newbies, until we
got the SS. On paper you'd think it opposite: Turnstone had the
motor forward of the rudder (ideal, right?), while the SS has a
keel hung rudder, and then way back on the counter stern is the
motor well. But not so.
In terms of safety both boats have strong points and their own
weaknesses. Turnstone supposedly had built-in positive flotation,
while the security of a self-righting deep keel design can't be
disputed (unless you're a die-hard Bolger aficionado!!)
I could go on, as I love both boats, and them being so fundamentally
different makes for an interesting discussion.
|